We suppose incidence off omitted varying within the low-separated egos is actually ?

We suppose incidence off omitted varying within the low-separated egos is actually ? Table 9 Strength of homophily/confounding indicates prevalence (?1) of omitted variable in divorced egos. 0 = 1 ?1. A value of ?1 = 0.5 indicates no confounding/homophily, and ?1 = 1 indicates maximum confounding/ homophily. The latest Part regarding Pupils We looked…